Learning Project Bipolar Disorder - 1666 Words

Learning Project: Bipolar Disorder Brianna Parker Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Learning Project: Bipolar Disorder Bipolar disorder is a very intense disorder and many people struggle with dealing with it on a day to day basis. According to the A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia (2013), bipolar disorder is a brain disorder that can affect your behavior, emotions, and wellness. Bipolar disorder symptoms are more severe than a personal just experiencing a bad day. They consistently interfere with a person’s everyday life. They can vary in intensity, from damaging previously healthy relationships, to thinking about committing suicide. Not all cases of bipolar disorder are the same in that some cases are more severe than†¦show more content†¦Because of this, there are two main types of bipolar disorder, bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder. Bipolar I disorder is the most common type out of the two disorders. As it states in the textbook Abnormal Psychology: Clinical and Scientific Perspectives (2014), the main difference between the two disorders is that bipolar I has the occurrence of a manic episode throughout the course of the disorder. A manic episode can be described as the person be very talkative at a fast pace, easily distracted, reckless behavior and lack of self control, little need for sleep, and elated. A person with bipolar I disorder can have a lack of self-control which can lead to a very dangerous sex life by engaging in unprotected sexual activity with multiple partners, or even obtaining a drug addiction. On the other end of the spectrum, there are occurrences of depressed episodes that are experienced by people with both bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder. Depressed episodes can be characterized by the person being in a bad mood or experiencing sadness daily. Feeling fatigued, having difficulty concentrating, not remembering things easily, and eating problems can stem from depressed episodes. Individuals may also experience a sense of hopelessness that can potentially lead to the attempt or even carr ying out suicide. Hypomanic episodes are also experienced by individuals with both bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder. These

Compare and Contrast the Role of Lay Personell Free Essays

Compare and contrast the role of and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts Lay people are individuals with no legal training from a variety of backgrounds which is said to be used to promote an equal society. The role of Magistrates and Jurors are similar in ways of characteristics needed; for example both must be aged 18-70 and those who are in the police or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. The selection process is however very different, the Lord Chancellor will appoint lay magistrates on behalf of the queen whereas jurors are selected by an electoral register for the area in which the court is situated and is done by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and Contrast the Role of Lay Personell or any similar topic only for you Order Now Lay Magistrates are unpaid, part time volunteers whereas jurors are also unpaid but may be unwilling however failure to attend can result in prosecution or a fine. Magistrates can claim a small allowance and compensation for lost earnings. Both parties make their decision based on facts, such as guilt or innocence in trials whereby the difference is that Magistrates can sentence the defendant whereas jurors cannot. Both are used in the right for a †trial by our peers†, ordinary people with experience of real life situations. Jurors will serve for a period of usually two weeks as apposed to Magistrates who will serve part time for different periods of time. Although lay magistrates and district judges do a very similar job there are many differences between how they work, their qualifications and employment. Lay magistrates, otherwise known as Justice of the Peace sit in magistrate’s courts, generally in groups of three, whereas judges usually sit alone. 1999 there were 90, of whom about 20% were women, whereas there are an almost equal number of men and women magistrates, showing that judges are not a mirror image of trial by ones peers such as lay people. Judges are members of the professional judiciary who are legally qualified and salaried, working full time whereas the lay magistrate and jury are not paid and work part time/ a period of two weeks. Judges have practised for at least 7 years as a barrister or a solicitor. One way to become a solicitor is have ‘A’ levels and go onto a Law degree then do 1 year on a legal practice course, then do a 2 year training period. One way to be a barrister is to do a Law degree then become a member of an Inn court and dine at the Inn or attend weekend courses, then do a 1 year ocational training course before being called to the bar. No formal qualifications are required for a lay magistrate or jury, but they do need intelligence, common sense, integrity and the capacity to act fairly. Lay magistrates are appointed by the Lord Chancellor (on behalf of the Queen) on the recommendation of the 100 local advisory committee, judges are also appointed by the Lord Chancellor and are appoi nted from those who have held advocacy qualifications for seven years. Soliciters play a totally different role all together, they tend to work alongside a Legal executive with the Legal executive being the Solicitors assistants, they will deal with the more straight forward cases themselves such as preparing wills or leases and also have limited rights of audience in court, mainly making applications in the County court where cases are not defended. Barristers are the specialists of the court room. However once a barrister receives his/her certificate to practice they undertake a completely different life style. This life requires them to dress in dark black gowns and white woolen wigs whilst they advocate in courts such as the crown court. They also wear this â€Å"uniform† whilst they are in their chamber and when they are giving out legal advice on their specialist subject of higher law unlike lay people who do not require a uniform and soliciters must wear a smart suit. Soliciters will instruct a Barrister for their client, and unlike barristers will establish a compelling defence for the barrister to then stand up in court and argue it for the client. However both parties must have a comprehesive understanding of law and soliciters can also give Barristers law advice on cases of law. E. g. negligence, wills, conveyancing etc. Unlike lay people and soliciters practicing Barristers are usually self-employed but usually work from sets of chambers with approximately 20 members in order to share administration costs and a clerk. More recent access to Justice act gives solicitors the right to do advocacy so they can also appear in court as advocates but need to gain an advocacy certificate before they can do so, unlike barristers. How to cite Compare and Contrast the Role of Lay Personell, Papers

How a Knowledge Claim Can Be Tested for Justification free essay sample

I personally believe that everyone’s truths are different as each ones reality is different. What is true for me may not be true for someone else. For example I believe life is difficult, it is a struggle, you have to work hard and persevere whereas for somebody else the truth maybe that life is easy and things happen effortlessly. Thus people’s beliefs and experiences are there truth. Both claim maybe different but they both are true to the person experiencing them. How can a knowledge claim be tested for justification? Let’s take the example of history. Is everything we read about fact? How much of what we read in our History textbooks is actually the author’s perception of the truth. Let’s take the example of various wars that have taken place between Pakistan and India. Indian Historians perception of the war obviously favors India whereas Pakistan Historians have recorded the same history favorable to the Pakistanis. We will write a custom essay sample on How a Knowledge Claim Can Be Tested for Justification? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Recent research has proven that a common man from Pakistan believes that they won the Kargil war whereas a common Indian also believes that India won the war. So what is the truth? Our historians from both countries lying. No I believe that it is simply different versions of the truth. Before we belief a claim to be true we must identify whether the person making the claim has any personal relationship or involvement with the claim. If he stands to gain personally or may have a bias opinion due to personal beliefs then we have reason to doubt his claim. Also your memory and personal relationship with a person making a claim can test the reliability of the claim. In certain cases it may also cause you to doubt a claim that is actually true. For example if I Know a friend who has a tendency to exaggerate and make belief things then even if he is speaking the truth my own judgment of him can cause me to disbelief his truth. Whereas someone who I trust I may find it difficult to see through his lies. Body language is also a very important factor in determining whether one is claiming the truth or not. There are certain signs and signals that may cause me to doubt someone through close observation. For example someone cannot look me in the eye, someone being fidgety and twitching facial muscles or simply scratching their nose can give you warning signs of the possibility that claimant is lying. Conclusion- The world is not black and white and truths may not be complete truths or complete lies. There are lots of shades of grey in between the blacks and whites just as there are many possibilities and versions of the truth. When deciding whether a claim is authentic one should analyze the claim with a open mind and not let his personal judgment completely affect his conclusion.